Return-Path: Delivered-To: smelk@aicenergycorp.com Received: from server.64xmedia.com by server.64xmedia.com with LMTP id IDk1F8jTv2BBCwAAdUq3JA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:32:08 -0400 Return-path: Envelope-to: smelk@aicenergycorp.com Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:32:08 -0400 Received: from jax4mhob18.registeredsite.com ([64.69.218.106]:54122) by server.64xmedia.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqiOL-0000kB-5c for smelk@aicenergycorp.com; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:32:08 -0400 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.211]) by jax4mhob18.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 158KVMl8184583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:31:22 -0400 Received: (qmail 25612 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jun 2021 20:31:22 -0000 X-TCPREMOTEIP: 24.230.175.2 X-Authenticated-UID: kspilman@keitu.com Received: from unknown (HELO RazBerry) (kspilman@keitu.com@24.230.175.2) by 0 with ESMTPA; 8 Jun 2021 20:31:22 -0000 From: "Kathleen Spilman" To: "'Snow Melk'" , "'Roger Grimes'" , "'brandon'" Cc: "'John Melk'" , , , "'Kris Keller, P.E.'" References: <9AC8A2B8-2639-E645-ADA7-E8AEFDEBC08B@hxcore.ol> In-Reply-To: <9AC8A2B8-2639-E645-ADA7-E8AEFDEBC08B@hxcore.ol> Subject: RE: Civil Design Start Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:31:18 -0500 Message-ID: <006801d75ca5$3d356e30$b7a04a90$@keitu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0069_01D75C7B.54642120" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQEysAlnsOYvX5YrDVPpJyVF9BtRL6xT4kQw Content-Language: en-us X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 X-Spam-Score: 15 X-Spam-Bar: + X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server.64xmedia.com", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Let me offer some supplemental information… 1. A topographic map of the site was done by Kirby Engineering. Kirby did send me their files which got sent on to AIC. We also gave them to Interstate Engineering so that they could work with us to g [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: aicenergycorp.com] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 CPANEL_LOTS_OF_EMPTY_LINE RAW: Spam that has large block of empty lines 1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods -0.3 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Spam-Flag: NO This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0069_01D75C7B.54642120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Let me offer some supplemental information=E2=80=A6 =20 1. A topographic map of the site was done by Kirby Engineering. Kirby = did send me their files which got sent on to AIC. We also gave them to = Interstate Engineering so that they could work with us to get easements. 2. The Geotechnical Report is finalized =E2=80=93 Harvey is a PE and he = stamped it. It is a =E2=80=9Cgeneral preliminary=E2=80=9D report. We = should expect once the final locations of the major process vessels are = set, that RDS will ask us to go in and do some limited number of deeper = soil bores at those specific locations to assure we have the right = information for the major vessel foundations. There is nothing waiting = on Keitu to do in that regard. 3. Someone really needs to chat with Ryan Ross at RDS about the civil = site work. =20 I believe RDS expressly excluded that work from their EPC proposal. = (J-Melk had asked Keitu to review the EPC proposals back in early = February). Originally Wenck/Stantec was thought to be awarded the = =E2=80=9CBalance of Plant=E2=80=9D contract before the decision, for = USDA purposes, to go with a full EPC contractor approach rather than = spilt the assignments into ISBL, Balance of Plant for design and then = bid later for on-site construction contractor. Omicron = Engineering/Stephen Sanders was spearheading that effort without = Keitu=E2=80=99s involvement. So take my version of the backstory with a = grain of salt as I may not have all the facts. J-Melk asked me to get a = second bid from Interstate for the site civil work when he was up here = earlier this year for the same work Wenck bid on. Which I did. As = mentioned =E2=80=93 Snow has both proposals. I believe that RDS is = looking to do that work now as well. Again, I don=E2=80=99t think that = was part of their scope of work in their original EPC bid proposal. But = I am not involved in their contract/scope of work now. They now report = directly to AIC rather than to Keitu (they did for the preliminary = report / technical assessment). When they saw we forwarded the proposal = to AIC from Interstate =E2=80=93 they asked why they were not going to = get that work. My suggested =E2=80=93 and again I have not seen = RDS=E2=80=99 contract with AIC so I could be missing something vital, = but if they are going to do that work as part of their current contract = with AIC =E2=80=93 then that work apparently may have already been = awarded. Just make sure to understand if they are doing that work under = their existing price, or that they are entitled to do that on a T&M = basis, or whatever their understanding is of the situation.=20 =20 Kathye =20 From: Snow Melk =20 Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 1:29 PM To: Roger Grimes ; brandon = Cc: John Melk ; jwilson@aicenergycorp.com; = directory@aicenergycorp.com Subject: Re: Civil Design Start =20 Roger =20 We have two proposals for Civil design. Forword to you shortly. For the = two companies introduced by K2, we have just started to read the = proposal, we can discuss when to start further bidding, and which = company to choose in the end. I personally think that our 9003 USDA = needs final approval. And TOPO survey is done and Geotech report will be finalize by Keitu = Engineering.=20 Please directly contact Kathy , any questions about TOPO ,Geotrch = reports.=20 =20 All my best=20 =20 Renee L Melk=20 AIC Energy Corp. 2840 S Jones Blvd . Suite 1=20 Las Vegas NV89146 =20 _____ =20 From: Roger Grimes > Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 9:59 AM To: brandon Cc: John Melk; smelk@aicenergycorp.com = ; jwilson@aicenergycorp.com =20 Subject: Civil Design Start =20 Brandon: =20 I think we will need a topo survey for the site, including along our = easement routes for piping and stormwater, including adjacent roadway = rights-of-ways (everything we might need to touch), soon. Also we will = need a site Geotech report with sampling at all major load locations = such as tanks, process pads, flare tower, office/warehouse, etc. =20 Have you got a ND civil and Geotech on line that we can engage for this? = I think we need to get it going=E2=80=A6 =20 1. Roger =20 =20 =20 =20 Roger W. Grimes, PE Lead Engineer =20 Phone: 702.685.1118 =20 Direct: 509.309.5545 Email: rgrimes @aicenergycorp.com =20 2840 S. Jones Blvd. Ste 1 Las Vegas, NV 89146 =20 www.aicenergycorp.com =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0069_01D75C7B.54642120 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Let me offer some supplemental = information=E2=80=A6

 

  1. A topographic map of = the site was done by Kirby Engineering.=C2=A0 Kirby did send me their = files which got sent on to AIC.=C2=A0 We also gave them to Interstate = Engineering so that they could work with us to get = easements.
  2. The Geotechnical = Report is finalized =E2=80=93 Harvey is a PE and he stamped it.=C2=A0 It = is a =E2=80=9Cgeneral preliminary=E2=80=9D report.=C2=A0 We should = expect once the final locations of the major process vessels are set, = that RDS will ask us to go in and do some limited number of deeper soil = bores at those specific locations to assure we have the right = information for the major vessel foundations.=C2=A0 There is nothing = waiting on Keitu to do in that regard.
  3. Someone really needs to chat with Ryan Ross at RDS about the civil = site work.

 

I believe RDS expressly excluded that work = from their EPC proposal.=C2=A0 (J-Melk had asked Keitu to review the EPC = proposals back in early February). =C2=A0Originally Wenck/Stantec was = thought to be awarded the =E2=80=9CBalance of Plant=E2=80=9D contract = before the decision, for USDA purposes, to go with a full EPC contractor = approach rather than spilt the assignments into ISBL, Balance of Plant = for design and then bid later for on-site construction contractor.=C2=A0 = Omicron Engineering/Stephen Sanders was spearheading that effort without = Keitu=E2=80=99s involvement.=C2=A0 So take my version of the backstory = with a grain of salt as I may not have all the facts.=C2=A0 J-Melk asked = me to get a second bid from Interstate for the site civil work when he = was up here earlier this year for the same work Wenck bid on.=C2=A0 = Which I did.=C2=A0 As mentioned =E2=80=93 Snow has both proposals.=C2=A0 = I believe that RDS is looking to do that work now as well.=C2=A0 Again, = I don=E2=80=99t think that was part of their scope of work in their = original EPC bid proposal.=C2=A0 But I am not involved in their = contract/scope of work now.=C2=A0 They now report directly to AIC rather = than to Keitu (they did for the preliminary report / =C2=A0technical = assessment). When they saw we forwarded the proposal to AIC from = Interstate =E2=80=93 they asked why they were not going to get that = work.=C2=A0 My suggested =E2=80=93 and again I have not seen = RDS=E2=80=99 contract with AIC so I could be missing something vital, = but if they are going to do that work as part of their current contract = with AIC =E2=80=93 then that work apparently may have already been = awarded. Just make sure to understand if they are doing that work under = their existing price, or that they are entitled to do that on a T&M = basis, or whatever their understanding is of the situation. =

 

Kathye

 

From: Snow Melk = <smelk@aicenergycorp.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 = 1:29 PM
To: Roger Grimes <rgrimes@aicenergycorp.com>; = brandon <bsheets@aicenergycorp.com>
Cc: John Melk = <jmelk06@yahoo.com>; jwilson@aicenergycorp.com; = directory@aicenergycorp.com
Subject: Re: Civil Design = Start

 

Roger

 

We have two proposals for Civil design. Forword to you = shortly. For the two companies introduced by K2, we have just started to = read the proposal, we can discuss when to start further bidding, and = which company to choose in the end.  I personally think that our = 9003 USDA needs final approval.

And TOPO survey is done and Geotech report will be = finalize by Keitu Engineering. 

Please = directly contact Kathy ,  any questions about TOPO ,Geotrch = reports. 

 

All my best 

 

Renee L = Melk 

AIC Energy Corp.

2840 S Jones Blvd = . Suite 1 

Las Vegas = NV89146

 

From: Roger Grimes <rgrimes@aicenergycorp.com&g= t;
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 9:59 AM
To: = brandon
Cc: John Melk; smelk@aicenergycorp.com; jwilson@aicenergycorp.comSubject: Civil Design Start

 

Brandon:

 

I think we = will need a topo survey for the site, including along our easement = routes for piping and stormwater, including adjacent roadway = rights-of-ways (everything we might need to touch), soon.  Also we = will need a site Geotech report with sampling at all major load = locations such as tanks, process pads, flare tower, office/warehouse, = etc.

 

Have you got a ND civil and Geotech on line that we = can engage for this?  I think we need to get it = going=E2=80=A6

 

  1. Roger

 

 

 

 

3D"Logo Description

R= oger W. Grimes, PE

Lead = Engineer

 

Ph= one: = 702.685.1118&nbs= p;

Di= rect:  509.309.5545

Em= ail: = rgrimes@aicenergycorp.com

&n= bsp;

28= 40 S. Jones Blvd. Ste 1

La= s Vegas, NV 89146

&n= bsp;

www.aicenergycorp.com 

 

<= p class=3DMsoNormal> 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0069_01D75C7B.54642120--